But no. There's more. From today's email:
I`m sorry that you find an honest attempt to initiate an evidence based dialogue about the important implications of a law which deems to be non-human children who are in all likelihood as humans as you and I to be insulting. Rest assured that I do not consider scientifically descriptive evidence of the development of a child to be a "circus", regardless of what might occur elsewhere. I simply believe we all have a grave and clear duty of conscientious objection when faced by a law like subsection 223(1) which constitutes an assault on the principle of universal human rights.Typical Con, eh? Superiority, condescension, snark, and blame shifting. Some crappy sentence structure to boot.
My staff apologizes for the typographical error which you so importantly noted.
I am leaving the conversation here.
In other M312-related news, there's a new arrow in the fetus fetishists' quiver. Yet another website pressing the 'personhood' gambit.
But like the zygote zealots yipping on Twitter and blogs, this gang didn't get the memo about M312 NOT being about abortion atall atall.
Look what adorns its Contact your MP page.
The usual headless, featureless incubator with the All Important Fetus.
And look who holds the copyright. A gang called Life Issues Institute. Surprise! It's USian!
We don't want this BS in Canada. Contact your MP and tell her or him that.