Tuesday, 29 December 2009

Where Are the "Pro-lifers"?

Check out this blogpost. Cathie from Canada dissects this editorial and its callous misrepresentation of why it's important to investigate the preventable deaths of infants, babies and other vulnerable human beings, to ensure that such tragedies do not keep happening, and to demand accountability.

Here is the story of Mason Fullerton's death.

Where are the "Pro-lifers"? At Lifesite.ca, there's a button link that keeps flashing the message: "Healthcare reform should save lives, not destroy them." A search for the term Mason Fullerton came up empty.

"Pro-lifers" remain silent about the death of this BAY-BEE!!! because their extreme concern is all about The Fetus©™. BAY-BEEZ!!! no longer in residence inside their Fetal Support Unit (aka pregnant women) are not the focus of their ideologically-driven crusades.

7 comments:

Bina said...

Well, I'm sure there's a perfectly good explanation. And I'm sure it will be something to the effect that a system so callous and amoral as to allow abortion will also be so callous and amoral as to allow the death of Aboriginal babies like little Mason. And that once we abolish abortion, babies will stop dying of non-abortion causes, and cute fluffy orange kittens will poop marshmallow rainbows for everyone! Or something to that effect.

Deno said...

"Pro-lifers" remain silent about the death of this BAY-BEE!!! because their extreme concern is all about The Fetus©™. BAY-BEEZ!!! no longer in residence inside their Fetal Support Unit (aka pregnant women) are not the focus of their ideologically-driven crusades.

Ideologically driven crusades?

Excuse me, but you are the one who is using this tragedy to make a Ideologically driven attack on people you disagree with.

Using the death of a baby to make a political point is about as low as any person can get!

Deno

deBeauxOs said...

Make sure you share your concerns with Blob Blogging Wingnut, Deno. SHE perfected the technique.

Deno said...

deBeauxOs

Who are you talking about?

Deno

fern hill said...

Deno, I believe my co-blogger is referring to Canada's loudest, most fetal-pron crazed, most illogical fetus fetishist.

Deno said...

fern hill

Thanks for the link, sorry never been to that blog before. From the couple of post I glanced at they seem pretty tame to me but I’ll take your word for it that this person sometimes goes over the top to make her point. What does this have to do with the point I made above that the use of a baby’s death to make a political point is pretty low?

If this Blue Wave person does the same then since when does 2 wrongs make a right?

Looks like I walked into a middle of a fight here so I think I’ll just stop while I am ahead.

Again thanks for answering my question

Deno

deBeauxOs said...

Deno, many of HER blogposts are lies and obfuscations about feminists. SHE claims we hate men, hate babies, children, families, etc. etc.

We focus on the respect of women's rights: ensuring that choices for women include good pre and post natal healthcare, and support for vulnerable women, children, families.

Her focus is on criminalizing abortion, and on The Fetus©™ as a being separate from a pregnant woman.

Read some of our blogposts here, here, here, here and here to understand our perspective.

Post a Comment

Post a Comment