We Can't Stop Here...This Is Wombbat Country!

(boihowdee, when blogger said it wasn't supporting my browser on this machine, it meant it. sorry. hopefully fixed)

This, is a wombat.
A busy little tyke, like all marsupials, in times of physical stress her ability to abort offspring is easily done, as she's usually already carrying it in an external pouch.  Marsupial infants can be artificially raised apart from a maternal lactating pouch long before they can independently survive, as they are already predisposed to a non-placental environment.

This, is a womb-bat.
A busy little tyke, when it comes to bearing offspring, he thinks human women are marsupials too! Isn't that cute?  But being the big, grown-up Conservative Boy he really is, he's economically responsible and still prefers human women to continue placentally incubating human offspring instead of forcing the government to transfer the wee human bairns to expensive, although Totes Possible, artificial care until their human ex-utero viability date is signed-off on by Responsible Overseers.

He knows convincing irrational human women not to depend on modern artificial convenience to shorten their personal investment in the genetic future of Canada may turn out to be very problematic, but the issue is likely to be solved by the expedience of making the recalcitrant hysterics solely bear the costs of the artificial intervention.  There will be a further economic savings in that other human women will consider abstinence to be the far more wily economic choice after seeing the financial consquences of transferring a formative-human to its new, inhuman abode.

Some will say that once a human woman has started internally replicating another human, nothing should interfere with the countdown of the already clockwork course of events that result in full term birth, but our 'Mr Smith Gone to Wombington' believes that in this modern age, there is no reason to punish women for being sexually active when there is massive, highly delicate medical technology waiting to welcome formative-humans by the thousands.  The connected operating theater time, wound recovery, and of course, expense, will be more than punishment enough.

Given enough time, as more medical technology developments occur, the human female infants put into care as a result of these human-saving interventions, when not adopted out, can be incentivized to pay off their pre-childhood debts by becoming out-source womb surrogates.  This will drastically reduce the number of medical technicians required to monitor a formative-human.

The organic option, will of course require seeing the institutionalized human girls are raised in a manner optimal to internally supporting a new human capable of being adopted out to human parents shopping for the best human product, but since the formative-humans will be matured under the moral guidance of faith-based organizations, as our busy Womb-bat has been, what could possibly go wrong?

What could possibly go wrong...
 What could possibly go wrong...
   What could possibly go wrong...

This episode of "Fatherland Who's Who" has been brought to you today by Woodworth Fertilizers, where you can call bullshit good for business, but until it's broken up and lets light through, all it does is choke anyone downwind.

Patsies for Life

Still monitoring the fetus fetishist reaction to Stevie Peevie's 'NO' to a new abortion law. And his political death threat 'strong recommendation' to other ReformaTories:

A senior government official also says that while the prime minister will not "whip" or demand Conservative MPs vote as he votes, it will be "very strongly recommended" that Conservatives vote to defeat the bill.

Over at ProWoman ProLife a blogger gets all riled up in a blogpost titled 'Well that's a bit much'.

In the comments, we get the Official TheoCon Party of Canada spin.

Veronique Bergeron on 22 May 2010 at 3:49 pm

He is letting the MPs vote as they wish. That’s what “will not ‘whip’ or demand Conservative MPs vote as he votes” means , right? Full disclosure (for those who have not read my bio lately), I am a Conservative staffer for a pro-life MP.

On the question of why pro-lifers generally support the Conservative government (see the last comment here http://www.prowomanprolife.org/2010/05/19/we-are-not-over-reacting/)*, it is true that Harper’s Conservatives are not all that pro-lifers wish they were. But the “no new abortion law” position does exclude the co-existence of pro-life and pro-abortion positions within the same party. What makes the Conservatives the best option for pro-lifers – or the least bad option – is the possibility for pro-life MPs (and by extension the large swath of pro-life Canadians) to have their voice heard and their position considered politically. But it doesn’t mean that they should always get their way. That’s what democracy is all about, isn’t it?

There is a difference between welcoming the pro-life position and passing new abortion laws. By reflecting the spectrum of abortion positions that exist within the Canadian population, the Conservative government is the best home for pro-lifers. Because the Bloc Quebecois or NDP caucuses unanimously condemn the pro-life position doesn’t mean that there are no pro-life voters in Bloc or NDP constituencies. It just means that their voices are not heard. Ignoring the existence of pro-life voices in their constituencies was the downfall of Ignatieff’s Liberals on the infamous “abortion motion.” The critical mass of pro-life MPs on the government side of the House makes it impossible to ignore the way Michael Ignatieff ignored his pro-life MPs. At the political level, pro-lifers shouldn’t expect a democratically elected government to reflect anything but the mushy-middle-of-the-road view shared by most Canadians. But they are within their rights to expect their voices to be heard. Harper’s Conservatives are the only ones listening.

Shorter Conservative Staffer: 'Silly fetus fetishists. Just because we've been stringing you along forever, you really expect us to endanger our chance at a majority? Keep sending money and voting for us, though, and we'll pat you on your pointy little heads occasionally.'

*That was moi asking if people thought Stevie Peevie was lying and if so are they OK with that. And if they don't think he's lying, are they really happy being patsies?