Not much.
All of them, from all beats (politics, sports, urban affairs, business), say a bid for the 2024 Summer Games would range on a scale from "stupid" to "colosally stupid."
One, Royson James, initially a fervent booster, has now changed his mind.
Here they are in chronological order.
Cathal Kelly, July 27: Hosting the Olympics is a roller coaster of despair.
Chris Selley (1), July 28: Everyone take a deep breath -- Olympic fever is fertile soil for nonsense.
Globe and Mail, Report on Business, no byline, July 28: Dear Toronto: Hosting the Olympics is really really expensive.
Royson James (1) August 7: Bring on the Olympics.
Lorrie Goldstein, August 22: Olympic bid survival guide.
Edward Keenan, August 12: How to keep the T.O. mojo going -- with or without the Olympics.
John Barber, August 25: The case against the Olympics.
Christopher Hume, September 1: Let the Games begin -- Somewhere else.
Royson James (2), September 4: An Olympian effort is beyond us for now.
Chris Selley (2), September 4: Not screwing up the Pan Am Games is no reason to dive headfirst into the mother of all money pits.
The only people in favour of a bid are former elite athletes and people who stand to make money from it.
Here Councillor Shelley Carroll hits the nail on the head.
Councillor Shelley Carroll (Ward 33, Don Valley East) says there is no way city officials have the time to gear up for a 2024 bid. But she understands the enthusiasm in some circles.Gee, I wonder who those people would be?
“Whether you win or lose, preparing a bid is a business and you make money being the guy who gets to prepare the bid,” she said. “A whole bunch of consultants make money and a whole bunch of retired dignitaries, and retired CEOs, get to have fun with this project and play around with big amounts of public money.”
Here's a hint. Former co-chair of John Tory's campaign, former leader of a Toronto bid, and non-yet-declared member of the non-existent (if you believe them) Bid Committee, Bob Richardson howled over this admittedly mistitled Star article, This time, Bay St. joins Toronto's anti-Olympics team.
Will John Tory go ahead with a bid that will please only elite athletes and just plain elites?
We hope he'll soon give us an answer.
ADDED: It occurred to me that people might want to copy and paste just the links.
Cathal Kelly: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/kelly-the-emotional-rollercoaster-of-hosting-the-olympics/article25728670/
Hosting the Olympics is a roller coaster of despair
Chris Selley (1): http://www.nationalpost.com/m/wp/news/blog.html?b=news.nationalpost.com/toronto/chris-selley-everyone-take-a-deep-breath-olympic-fever-is-fertile-soil-for-nonsense&pubdate=2015-07-29
Everyone take a deep breath -- Olympic fever is fertile soil for nonsense
Globe and Mail, Report on Business, no byline: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/dear-toronto-hosting-the-olympics-is-really-really-expensive/article25731774/
Dear Toronto: Hosting the Olympics is really really expensive
Royson James: http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2015/08/07/bring-on-the-olympics.html
Bring on the Olympics
Lorrie Goldstein: http://www.torontosun.com/2015/08/22/olympic-bid-survival-guide
Olympic bid survival guide
Edward Keenan: http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2015/08/12/how-to-keep-the-to-mojo-going-with-or-without-the-olympics-keenan.html
How to keep the T.O. mojo going -- with or without the Olympics
John Barber: http://www.thestar.com/opinion/commentary/2015/08/25/the-case-against-an-olympic-bid.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
The case against the Olympics
Christopher Hume: http://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2015/09/01/hume-let-the-games-begin-somewhere-else.html
Let the Games begin -- Somewhere else
Royson James (2): http://www.thestar.com/news/city_hall/2015/09/04/an-olympian-efforts-beyond-us-for-now-james.html
An Olympian effort is beyond us for now
Chris Selley (2): http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/chris-selley-not-screwing-up-the-pan-am-games-is-no-reason-to-dive-headfirst-into-the-mother-of-all-money-pits
Not screwing up the Pan Am Games is no reason to dive headfirst into the mother of all money pits
UPDATED September 9/15: Two more.
Richard Florida, Why Toronto Should Say No to the Olympics
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/why-toronto-should-say-no-to-the-olympics/article26263925/
Martin Regg Cohn, Why the Pan Am Games Don't Qualify Us for Olympics
http://www.thestar.com/news/queenspark/2015/09/09/why-pan-am-games-dont-qualify-us-for-olympics-cohn.html
UDATE, September 11/15: Globe and Mail editorial
2 comments:
Thanks for producing this summary. It's great to know so many credible sources are waking up to the myths surrounding the Olympics.
Shelley Carroll hit the nail right on the head! Good for her!
The Os are expensive and not many locally benefit. How did the average Vancouverite benefit? Some got new careers out of it, but on the whole, there is no upside. The last time the Os made money was in Calgary.
If some dictatorship wants them, let them have it. Its all about corporate sponsorship anyhow. the athletes are all trying for corporate sponsorships also.
I'd be just as happy if the Os went away. if they were to continue then I'd suggest a decision be made about holding them at permanent venues, which would be supported by the O. committee. These permanent sites could also be used for training.
The continued building of new sites is not great for the environment, a waste of natural resources, and a drain on the finances of countries which could/should use the money to develop social programs. if Toronto can't house their homeless then they ought not to be holding an O games. Just too expensive and we all pay. We don't need to turn some Canadian city into an armed camp because a bunch of "dignitaries" and athletes are coming.
Post a Comment